Driven by our experience as CPAs to 800+ startups working within scores of Silicon Valley Competitors, thousands of conversations with founders about their banking experiences and meetings with 20+ banks, we list out the top SVB alternatives in 2024.
Kruze’s startup clients collectively manage billions of dollars across the top startup banks, giving us a unique view into the top Silicon Valley Bank competitors. Use our comparison tools to find SVB alternatives, and watch our videos by experienced startup CFOs and accountants to understand what founders should look for in their banking stack.
In the wake of the 2023 banking crisis, the landscape for startup banking has dramatically shifted. As a result, founders are now more focused than ever on finding safe, reliable, and feature-rich banking partners. This article explores the top Silicon Valley Bank competitors and alternatives, providing insights to help startups make informed decisions about their financial partners in 2024. You can also read our entire report on the best banks for startups, which includes market share reports and pros and cons for a dozen plus Silicon Valley Bank alternatives.
The failure of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) in early 2023 sent shockwaves through the startup ecosystem, prompting a reevaluation of banking practices among founders and venture capitalists alike. This event highlighted the importance of diversification and the need for robust, tech-savvy banking solutions tailored to the unique needs of startups.
As we navigate the post-SVB landscape, several key players have emerged as strong alternatives, each offering distinct advantages for startup founders. Let’s explore these options and the factors you should consider when choosing a bank account for your startup. We’ll also provide market share numbers for these banks - keep in mind that the median startup now has two different banking relationships, so the total market share will add up to well over 100%! Kruze is a partner of several of the companies mentioned on this review, and if you use our link to sign up you may get a sign up bonus and we may receive a referral fee. Our executives may also own stock in public and private companies that we mention.
Some of these are not technically banks, but have an underlying relationship with a bank. We encourage you to perform your own diligence on any financial institution before you establish a relationship.
Click on the logo to add or remove providers from the comparison chart.
JPMorgan Chase has emerged as a dominant force in the startup banking sector, attracting over 60% of startups in the immediate aftermath of the SVB crisis. During the banking crisis, JPMorgan stepped up and supported founders with a rapid onboarding process. They have a great reputation for stability, this has made it a go-to choice for many founders.
Key features for Chase business checking customers:
Downsides to JPM is that it’s harder to open an account than you’d hope - if you get into the tech banking group, they’ll set you up! But if you walk into a random branch you may end up with a small business account that doesn’t quite work for a funded startup. It also takes a phone call to get many things done at JPM, which can be annoying for some tech founders.
While JPMorgan Chase has seen slight erosion in market share in Q4 2023, it remains a top choice for startups seeking a well-established, stable banking partner.
Mercury, a financial technology company (not actually a bank), has demonstrated substantial growth in both customer base and deposit share. This online fintech has gained popularity among tech companies due to its easy account opening process and robust fintech integrations. It’s become one of the main go-to choices in Silicon Valley and beyond for tech startups.
Key features:
The primary downside is that Mercury is not technically a bank - Mercury partners with FDIC insured banks to offer its banking products and services. Mercury has no physical branches, which isn’t a big deal for most founders, given how great its mobile banking is.
Nearly 40% of new startups have chosen Mercury, entrusting the bank with over half of their cash. Its appeal lies in its modern approach to banking and its focus on serving the unique needs of tech startups.
Leveraging its existing relationships through corporate card services, Brex has successfully expanded into cash management solutions for startups. Like Mercury, it’s not technically a bank, instead offering its services through partner banks. During the SVB crisis, because so many startups had a corporate card with Brex, they were able to gain significant share in the bank-like services market - nearly 30% of Kruze clients now store some or most of their cash with Brex. The company has solidified its position as a key player, especially among newly incorporated startups.
Key features:
Brex’s all-in-one financial platform approach has resonated with many startup founders looking for comprehensive business banking services. The biggest downside is that it’s not a bank, and you basically need to use their corporate card solutions to get their cash management solutions.
HSBC has been making moves to capture a share of the startup banking market by hiring experienced tech bankers from SVB and FRB (another casualty of the SVB crisis, unfortunately). While they’re still developing their startup-focused offerings, HSBC’s global presence and financial stability make them a potential contender.
Key features:
The downsides are that it’s a big bank and can move a bit more slowly; however, we are hopeful that the solid tech bankers that they’ve hired will solve these issues for our clients. And the international presence is great.
Arc is a fintech company that has gained traction in the startup banking space. While not technically a bank, it offers a range of services tailored to startups, from a cash management account to higher-yield solutions for excess cash. They’ve recently added a deep venture debt marketplace, which we did a podcast on.
Key features:
The main downsides of Arc are that it’s not a traditional bank, has no physical branches, and is a relatively new player in the market. As a startup itself, it may not offer all the services that traditional banks do.
Bank of America is a large, established financial institution that has been making efforts to cater to the startup market. Despite its stability, it hasn’t gained much market share among startups - mainly because it’s hard to open an account, and their bankers don’t really get tech startups all that well.
Key features:
However, Bank of America has some drawbacks for startups. Most of their bankers don’t fully understand the unique needs of startups, and their customer service can be hit or miss. They’re not particularly focused on early-stage companies, and many of their account offerings may not be a good fit for startups.
Bridge Bank has positioned itself as a strong contender in the startup banking space, with a deep understanding of the tech industry’s needs. They’ve brought on experienced tech relationship managers, and have a pretty good suite of products for high-growth small businesses and startups.
Key features:
The main drawbacks of Bridge Bank are its limited geographic footprint with branch offices and a potentially less sleek online interface compared to some fintech competitors. Their relationship-based approach may not suit all founders; they do try to chat on the phone with you!
Meow is another fintech company entering the startup banking space, offering modern banking solutions - although it’s not technically a bank. They tend to appeal to founders who like online and mobile banking and UX.
Key features:
Like Arc, Meow is not technically a bank and doesn’t have physical branches. As a new player and a startup itself, it may not offer all the services that traditional banks do.
Rho is a fintech company that has been gaining attention in the startup banking world. It’s not technically a bank, instead providing banking services through partnerships with FDIC insured banks. The company offers solid options to SMBs, mid-market companies and startups. We particularly like their cash management/treasury tools.
Key features:
The main drawbacks of Rho are similar to other fintech options - it’s not technically a bank, has no physical branches, and is a relatively new player in the market.
Not to be confused with First Citizens, the bank that bought Silicon Valley Bank, Citizens is actively investing in growing its startup banking practice. This includes sponsoring a number of tech events, and building out a dedicated Technology & Communications team.
Key features:
They are still trying to grow market share, and won’t have as slick of a online user interface as Mercury or some of the very tech forward banks.
Despite the crisis, SVB has managed to retain some market share, primarily among existing clients. About half of startups still have a funded account with Silicon Valley Bank. However, newly incorporated startups are less likely to choose SVB as their primary banking partner.
Key features:
We’ve met with quite a few SVB bankers in the past year, and they are still hustling, helping founders, getting debt for startups, etc. The acquisition by First Citizens seems to have been well executed, so we would encourage founders to talk to them.
Given the significant role Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) has played in the startup ecosystem, and its recent acquisition by First Citizens, it’s worth considering its pros and cons separately:
Pros:
Cons:
When evaluating Silicon Valley Bank alternatives, founders of VC-backed startups should look for financial institutions that offer specialized business banking services tailored to startups. You’d be amazed at how many big banks (and small ones as well) don’t get startups! Here are the key services and factors to consider:
By carefully evaluating these business banking services and factors, startup founders can select a financial institution that not only protects their funds but also provides the specialized solutions necessary to support their unique business needs and fuel growth in the competitive tech landscape.
Remember, the right banking partner should act as more than just a place to store money – it should be a strategic ally in your startup’s journey.
In the post-SVB landscape, diversification has become a key strategy for startups. Our analysis shows that the median startup now uses two banks, up from just one before the Silicon Valley Bank crisis. This shift reflects a growing awareness of the importance of spreading risk and ensuring access to funds across multiple business bank accounts.
While using multiple banks can provide added security, it’s important to balance this with the complexity of managing multiple accounts. For most startups, maintaining relationships with two to three banks is likely sufficient to mitigate risk while keeping financial management manageable.
Another item to consider when working with multiple banking partners - especially the fintech players who partner with third party banks to get FDIC insurance (and extended FDIC insurance) is to make sure that if your startup isn’t using the same underlying banks. FDIC insurance is complicated, but essentially a company only gets $250,000 in coverage for each bank that it works with, so there isn’t an advantage of having multiple accounts originated by the same fintech player heading into the same bank.
Venture debt has emerged as a competitive edge for some banks in attracting startup deposits. This form of financing can be an attractive option for startups looking to extend their runway without diluting equity.
When considering a banking partner, it’s worth exploring their venture debt offerings and understanding how these products might fit into your startup’s financial strategy. Banks categorized as “Other” in our analysis have effectively used venture debt offerings to attract new startup clients.
Modern startups prefer financial partners that offer cutting-edge, accessible banking solutions. Banks with legacy systems face significant challenges in attracting tech-savvy founders who expect seamless digital experiences.
Key technological features to look for in business banking services include:
As a startup founder, selecting the right business bank account is crucial. The choice between a traditional financial institution and a financial technology company for your banking services can significantly impact your operations. Let’s explore the strengths of each option to help you make an informed decision for your tech company.
Traditional Banks:
Fintech Companies:
Considerations:
The hybrid approach: Many of our clients at Kruze Consulting have found that a hybrid approach works best. They maintain business bank accounts with both a traditional bank and a fintech company, leveraging the strengths of each.
For example:
This dual approach allows startups to benefit from the stability and comprehensive services of traditional financial institutions while also enjoying the innovation and startup-focused features of fintech platforms. We’ve observed that many of our clients find success in using both: maintaining an account with a traditional bank for certain services, while also leveraging a fintech player like Mercury or Brex for others. This balanced approach allows them to maximize the benefits of both worlds, ensuring they have access to a full range of banking solutions tailored to their unique needs as a growing tech company.
Ultimately, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer to whether a traditional bank or a fintech is better for your startup’s banking needs. Your choice should depend on your specific requirements, growth stage, and operational needs. By considering a hybrid approach, you can potentially get the best of both worlds and create a banking strategy that fully supports your startup’s growth and financial management needs.
The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank has reshaped the startup banking landscape, emphasizing the importance of diversification, technological innovation, and tailored financial services for early-stage companies. As we move forward in 2024, startups have more options than ever when it comes to choosing a banking partner.
Whether you opt for an established player like JPMorgan Chase, a digital-first solution like Mercury, or a comprehensive financial platform like Brex, the key is to choose a partner that aligns with your startup’s unique needs and growth trajectory. Consider factors such as financial stability, tech integration, startup-specific products, and customer service when making your decision.
Remember, thebest business banks for startups are those that not only safeguard your funds but also provide the tools and support necessary for your company’s growth. Additionally, as you navigate post-crisis banking, it’s worth exploringhow venture debt has evolved in this new landscape.
By staying informed about your options and carefully evaluating potential banking partners, you can ensure that your startup’s financial foundation is as solid and growth-oriented as possible in the dynamic world of tech startups.
Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) collapsed in March 2023 due to a combination of factors, including a mismatch between its assets and liabilities, a high concentration of deposits from the tech sector, and a bank run triggered by fears about its financial stability. The bank’s failure was the largest since the 2008 financial crisis and sent shockwaves through the startup and venture capital ecosystem.
Kruze’s phones were ringing off the hooks as the SVB crisis unfolded, and our clients moved over one billion dollars in just a few days.
Again, the good news is that they were acquired by First Citizens, a well-respected bank that has a history of successfully acquiring other banks.
Key points about the SVB collapse:
In the aftermath, SVB was acquired by First Citizens Bank. In our opinion, after the messiness of the crisis, the new ownership is working hard to restore SVB to its prior position. Silicon Valley Bank’s team and solution set continue to be excellent for funded startups, and despite the large number of solid competitors, it’s worth looking into them as your banking solution.
Here is how we remember the crisis happening: